|
The
Case of Spain
Although Spain held its position at number 23
in the Growth Index, it is still behind some
of its main European rivals and also scores
worse than supposedly less developed countries
such as Singapore and Chile. The absence of
any significant
change in comparison with last year is due to
some strong macro-economic results and an improvement
in its technology index, which together have
countered the decline in the quality of its
public institutions.
Given that Spain has remained in 23rd position,
and bearing in mind that this is also the place
it holds in the world rankings for GDP per capita,
the result can be seen as positive. However,
though it is true that Spain retains certain
important competitive advantages in respect
to the macroeconomic environment and a highly
positive position in this regard (16), the quality
of the countrys public institutions (34)
leaves much to be desired, having fallen three
places from last year. Issues such as the independence
of the judiciary, irregular payments and the
protection of property rights have placed Spain
among the lowest-placed European countries and
behind countries like Ghana, Botswana and Morocco.
The
Innovation Factor
As far as technology is concerned, Spain scored
well (20), though this observation should be
qualified. Firstly, the WEF report uses different
formulae for measuring the technological competitiveness
of the various economies, depending on whether
or not they belong to the group of innovative
countries. This group includes the 25 economies
with the highest number of U.S. registered patents,
and distinguishes between countries whose growth
depends on their capacity for innovation and
those that depend on the adoption of foreign
technology, as is the case in Spain. In this
second group, the formula applied gives much
less weight to innovation and the use of Information
and Communications Technologies (ICT), while
including technology transfers, which basically
consists of using investment and foreign licenses
as a basis for acquiring new technology. It
is clear that, when assessed in this way, Spain
obtains a high ranking, though the country must
then be capable of moving up to the next level
and becoming a technology creator.
Secondly, the areas in which Spain shows significant
competitive disadvantages, which are basically
those that relate to ICT, have a direct influence
on the way the business community functions.
As a result, the creation of new technologies
and higher levels of investment in research
and development are key to obtaining higher
levels of productivity. Spain from reaching
a par with those of its main European partners.
As the attached tables show, Spains main
competitive advantages can be found in its businesses,
though this is also where its main disadvantages
lie. The country enjoys significant
Weak
Business Environment
Spains position in the Business Competitiveness
Index is lower than the level achieved in respect
of GDP per capita. This places the country among
the group of over-achievers, those
nations whose economic results are better than
they should be
according to the competitiveness index. The
special case of another over-achiever, Norway,
offers a better understanding of this contradiction.
This is a country with very high levels of per
capita income but a rather lower competitiveness
score.
Why should this be? Norway has abundant oil
reserves, but its companies lack the dynamism
and ability shown by those of Finland and Japan,
where an absence of natural resources has forced
them to get their act together and
look to continuous
innovation as a way of attaining an increasingly
improved standard of living.
More
Disadvantages than Advantages
The Business Competitiveness Index reveals the
weak points that prevent productivity levels
in Spain from reaching a par with those of its
main European partners. As the attached tables
show, Spains main competitive advantages
can be found in its businesses, though this
is also where its main disadvantages lie. The
country enjoys significant competitive advantages
in areas such as interest rate differentials,
mobile telephone penetration, the strength of
the banking system and the quality of its business
schools.
That being said, when it comes to doing business
in Spain, regulation and employment practices,
access to financing, the state promotion of
Information and Communications Technologies
(ICT) and bureaucracy represent real obstacles
for business. It is imperative that governments
create a business environment that operates
in optimum conditions of competition and efficiency.
This allows companies to take advantage of their
full production potential. For their part, the
companies themselves display worrying weaknesses,
such as insufficient sophistication in the areas
of operations and strategy, particularly in
respect of R&D. To counteract this, businesses
must place greater emphasis on investment.
|
|
| |
Strong macroeconomic results and technological
improvements offset the falling quality
of public institutions.
In respect of technology, Spain scores
well. However, it now needs to move from
using foreign technology to actually creating
its own.
Spains economic results are better
than they should be according to its level
of microeconomic competitiveness. This
must be reversed in order to ensure a
platform that will allow higher levels
of GDP per capita and sustainable growth.
The greatest obstacles to business are
regulation and employment practices, access
to financing and bureaucracy.
|
|
|